Friday, March 05, 2010

Can someone please tell me how the BCS ends the year with FOUR PAC-10 teams with an 8-4 record?

9 comments:

Andy said...

Well, that would be 32-16 total.

I'm not sure I understood the question right. If you're talking about the final BSCS standings from last year...yeah, I get it.

Oregon, Oregon State, Stanford, Arizona, and USCCC...yep, that's way out of whack.

The Championship Conference only had 'Bama, Florida, and LSU.

The other almost Championship Conference only had Texas, Okie St., and The Huskers.

So, to answer your question, the BCS sucks...always has...always will. I think the computers must be on the west coast.

When is September gonna be this year?

Skunkfeathers said...

By using libtard calculations?

Word Verif: monfu

paul mitchell said...

Andy, check the record of those five teams, FOUR of them were 8-4. Dude, there were NO other conferences with an 8-4 team. Nebraska? 9-4.

Skunks, even liberals are not stupid enough to pick PAC-10 teams in the top 25.

Basil said...

Andy explained it. He went the long way around, but nailed it: The BCS sucks.

Andy said...

USCCC was 8-4, and won against an equally weak BC to finish 9-4.

Oregon was 10-2, and lost to the Bucktards to end up at 10-3.

Oregon St. was 8-4, before being humiliated by the Mormons to finish 8-5.

Stanford, ditto! But had the extreme humiliation of falling to the Sooners to end up 8-5.

And AZ rounded out the fail with a similar 8-4 record before Bo's Huskers completed the butt-whipping of the bowl season on 'em.

So...what were we talking about? Oh yeah! I understood what you meant. And, the BCS Sucks!

And...when is September gonna be?

paul mitchell said...

Bowl games don't count toward the final record, though, Andy. Oregon was the only one of the five that was not 8-4 at season's end. I was waiting at the dentists office today when I noticed that for the very first time.

I was counting days to September on my calendar hoping it would get there before the dentist. FAIL.

Basil, the BCS sucks HARD. We need to use your playoff system. At least we wouldn't have had TCU in the top ten, probably.

Andy said...

No doubt, Paul. Oregon was the ONLY above 8 win team. And, you realize that several of those 8-win teams in the Pac-10 were only 8-win teams because they play each other.

Kinda like being a dwarf among midgets...

Finally getting those dentures you've been saving up for?

paul mitchell said...

Andy, the PAC-10 likes to be called, "Little People!" RAAAAACIST!!!

And now that the United States taxpayer has taken my son on to raise, I have enough money to get those dentures. Dude, I had a blast at the dentist today, no lie, I am going to blog it, soon.

paul mitchell said...

Andy, check the record of those five teams, FOUR of them were 8-4. Dude, there were NO other conferences with an 8-4 team. Nebraska? 9-4.

Skunks, even liberals are not stupid enough to pick PAC-10 teams in the top 25.

Post a Comment