Tuesday, March 30, 2010

The Never Ending Argument (UPDATED!!!)

UPDATE AT THE BOTTOM.

For the sake of clarity, I use the terms "liberal" and "conservative" in the current political vernacular in this post. Usually I use the word "moron" for liberal and "normal" for conservative in my posts. But, bear with me for this one post.

Attempting to carry on a spirited debate with people that have no points they can defend is futile. But, it must be done. Try to make that make sense.

When you try to bring facts to the table in a debate with someone that calls him/herself a "liberal," they immediately roll up their defenses and turn on the vitriol. Such is the nature of the game, we, the conservatives, assume that there are basic truths that are unwavering, yet they, the liberals, feel that there is an ever-changing series of random events that make up history. Nothing can ever be resolved in history for them, everything is subject to interpretation from the lens of RIGHT FRIGGIN' NOW. Again, it is futile to discuss things with a liberal, because daily, they look back at their past ideas, see the monumental failure of those ideas and then toss them aside.

When liberals jettison an idea, amazingly because it has failed so many times, they immediately attach that failed idea to the very people that opposed them throughout the entire time liberals were promoting that very idea. Want an example of what that means?

Liberals, or the people that now call themselves liberals, were always the ones that promoted slavery, a ruling class of elites, and serfdom. Liberals are the plantation owners, especially Southern Democrats, which are still in the majority down here in the South. The OVERWHELMING MAJORITY. That has always been the case. Never have these very same people changed their ideology, they have just repackaged the very same ideas into new and exciting different ways. Since OWNING black people or keeping folks in the poor camp was always disparaged by the common man, liberals had to regroup and repackage those ideas into different government programs to keep those folks in their place. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, public schools, public universities, government subsidized housing, and finally government funded "healthcare" are ALL the very same idea of slavery folks. You cannot deny it. It is one of those hard and fast FACTS that liberals hate so damn much.

But, there are still folks that have yet to decide what is the right political ideology for them. And there are some folks that just are never going to be engaged in the political process until it is too late, no matter how important it really is. I know hundreds, maybe thousands of people that just simply go to the polls and vote the same way that their parents did. I know hundreds, maybe thousands of folks that voted for Barry Obama simply because he was HALF black, too.

Those are the ones that must be reached, we can no longer allow liberals to control our future. Liberals are simply too stupid to do that without dire repercussions to the world. As always, if the Theory of Natural Selection was actually etched in stone, liberals would not exist. Their very belief system defies their very belief system. Get it?

Racism is a purely "liberal" ideological concept. Looking at someone and immediately stereotyping those folks into a certain group, based solely on the color of their skin, is what liberals profess to hate, but they are the only ones that do it. This is the very foundation of racism. When a liberal calls a conservative a "racist," this is known in the head shrinking world as "projection" and liberals have mastered the art of it.

And again, since liberals have ZERO credibility in the idea game, it simply must be about RAAAAACISM!!! Trust me, I have seen racism and hate from both sides of the aisle. I have seen it happen to black folks and I have seen it happen to white folks. I don't give a shit about it, I never have. It's wrong, so I do not do it and sometimes in today's climate, that is damned tough to do, too. But, some folks grew up differently than I did, so I have to make sure they do not bring their bullshit around me.

I used to work for a minority owned architecture firm. My boss made every step possible to NOT hire white people. He promoted his firm as minority owned and took every opportunity to promote the "diversity" of his firm. It was HIS firm, that was his choice, still that is textbook racism. However, since architecture is a profession run mainly by the liberal elite, his success was made much more difficult simply because he was black. The fact that he is batshit crazy kinda compounded matters, too. However, I enjoyed working there because the vast majority of people working there were my best friends in the world AND I liked working with the batshit crazy dude. Days were certainly never boring.

But, there was one white dude there that called me into his office to try to persuade me to join his militia against the boss. I really think that he had an idea that he could take over the firm or something, even though he did not even own any of it, as crazy as that seems. He started his lobbying of me with a statement about that "nigger being crazy." My immediate response was to go nuts on him asking what I had done to give him the VERY WRONG idea that it was okay to talk to me that way. And guess what? He was a far, far left nutbiscuit that worked at that firm simply to help the black dude out and to prove to his "conservative" buddies that black folks could be successful in the architecture business. How offensive is that bullshit? Ignore the fact that he was lying about having any conservative friends at all.

Now, onto the BLOG SHOW!!!

The continual screeching from liberals has to be addressed and we ALL have to do it. One of the most offensive ideas in the political realm to me today is that somehow the Dixiecrats have gotten pinned on the Republicans. It took me all of ONE MORNING (May 28, 2005) to utterly and completely debunk that damned lie. Yes, I found all of the names of every Dixiecrat that walked out of the DEMOCRAT PARTY in 1948, I documented their political affiliation at the time of their deaths or they are still alive, and I found that THREE OF FIFTY switched parties to the Republicans at least TEN YEARS after the Dixiecrats disbanded. All of the others, forty-seven in all, simply went back to being Democrats. Why do the national media jabbering heads continue to promote the lie? Because again, liberals, once they have chunked away an ideology, immediately pin that ideology upon their political opponents.

To this day, the Democrats are credited with passing civil rights legislation when NOTHING could be further from the truth. Why is that? Because they fought so hard in their losing battle they had to change their ideology on that topic and immediately they attribute their original ideology to the opposing side. Why does the national media promote the idea that Democrats and liberals helped pass civil rights legislation? Because those media people are liberals and when liberals finally chunk an idea because they are losing in the ideological battle, they immediately attribute that idea to the opposing side.

Holy HELL! Senator Robert Byrd (Dumbass-WV), actually filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for fourteen friggin' hours and he is STILL in the Senate and is a Democrat. Most of the liberals and Democrats also refer to him as "The Conscious of the Senate" (HuffPo link) and Barbara boxer called him, "the love of her life." How offensive is that shit?

Again, the liberals cannot keep saying the same stuff they always said because it is stupid, so somehow they have to attach it to their political rivals. The national media is complicit in this farce.

Want a brief rundown of these very items to which I refer? How about "global warming" becomes catastrophic climate change. "Universal healthcare" becomes insurance reform. Legalizing illegal aliens becomes "amnesty for undocumented workers" becomes "immigration reform."

The things that Republicans/Conservatives have said were in ObamaCare have ALWAYS been in the legislation. Government funding for abortion, which Democrats now say abortions will go DOWN with this law, has ALWAYS been in the POS. Government control of services, including "death panels," has ALWAYS been in this POS. Regulations that shall cause medical insurance and treatment to become more expensive have ALWAYS been in this POS. HUGE increases in medical costs to younger people have ALWAYS been in this POS. Democrat bribery and pay-offs have ALWAYS been attached to this POS. Again, EVERYTHING that Republicans/Conservatives have been telling you ALL ALONG about ObamaCare is TRUE.

And when it fails completely, utterly, and totally, Democrats/Liberals will blame it on Republicans/Conservatives and double down, yet again, on their very same ideology in some repackaged form. Squat and watch. I guarantee it.

For the last week, the national media has been trying to attach the RAAAAACIST and violent meme to our ideological brethren in the Tea Parties. They continually maintain that conservatives are the ones doing these acts and they will continue to ratchet up that meme. At the very same time, the REAL violence and vandalism shall be ignored. They have to keep up the projection, while ignoring the acts of liberal violence and racism.

Hell, the liberal media will ignore DECADES of liberal violence and racism to push the meme that conservatives are the ones doing it. And when they finally recognize decades old liberal violence, they immediately tie it to the Tea Parties. Even though the EVIDENCE of conservative violence and racism is virtually non-existent. And they publish BLATANT falsehoods about the increasing number of normal people that are fed the fuck up with the federal government becoming more and more oppressive to everyone. (The Unibomber and Freddies Fashion Mart keeps getting forgotten, too. Seriously, there THOUSANDS of examples of liberal shitdouchery.)

Of course, Barry Obama is a HUGE proponent of liberal violence and rhetoric. BILL AYERS? And Obama simply must totally denigrate and destroy his detractors.

Do NOT even get me started on the liberal hatred of Christians.

By the way, Barry Obama's radical racist pastor was in Jackson, Mississippi, at Jackson State University, to promote his black supremacy ideology and sign copies of his book at a historically BLACK university. Are you offended by the doubly racist implications of that, too?



UPDATE:

One of our resident trolls, OSO, was kind enough to link an image that captures perfectly the concept of how the Democrats/Liberals change their message as their ever failing ideology changes. Sadly, he was not astute enough to realize the irony of the linked image. Such is ALWAYS the case of being liberal, you can never aspire to be anything more than a flat-out moron until you realize how stupid liberalism is.

Please take the time to comment or click one of the 'Share/Save' buttons. DO IT NOW!

17 comments:

Skunkfeathers said...

The late (not soon enough) Howard Zinn did his libtard best to rewrite history; the libtard media goes along with it. You've nailed their wadded panties to the wall, so you can look to be lumped into the racist teabaggers by the libtard morons of the blogisphere, among others.

All because you're RIGHT on FACTS. And that is heresy to libtards (being right and using facts).

JMK said...

"When liberals jettison an idea, amazingly because it has failed so many times, they immediately attach that failed idea to the very people that opposed them throughout the entire time liberals were promoting that very idea. Want an example of what that means?

Liberals, or the people that now call themselves liberals, were always the ones that promoted slavery, a ruling class of elites, and serfdom. Liberals are the plantation owners, especially Southern Democrats, which are still in the majority down here in the South. The OVERWHELMING MAJORITY. That has always been the case. Never have these very same people changed their ideology, they have just repackaged the very same ideas into new and exciting different ways. Since OWNING black people or keeping folks in the poor camp was always disparaged by the common man, liberals had to regroup and repackage those ideas into different government programs to keep those folks in their place. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, public schools, public universities, government subsidized housing, and finally government funded "healthcare" are ALL the very same idea of slavery folks...


..."Racism is a purely "liberal" ideological concept. Looking at someone and immediately stereotyping those folks into a certain group, based solely on the color of their skin, is what liberals profess to hate, but they are the only ones that do it. This is the very foundation of racism. When a liberal calls a conservative a "racist," this is known in the head shrinking world as "projection" and liberals have mastered the art of it." (Paul Mitchell)

Absolutely and WITHOUT question true!

A GREAT piece!

paul mitchell said...

Skunks, JMK, it drives me NUTS to hear people on the television networks that I grew up watching tell me that people who believe what I believe are violent racist morons. Do they really think that there is no one that remembers the past? The only answer is that they think that they control the past as well as the future. I think that it is our job to make them WRONG.

One Salient Oversight said...

Facts are annoying

paul mitchell said...

Yep, OSO, I agree, thanks for solidifying my point. I am surely sorry that you are not smart enough to see what you just did.

Lisa G in NZ said...

Wow, this is a great post. I've found your blog this week and am hooked... keep up the great work at speaking out!

cheers from a Chicago girl, gone Galt, living in Auckland...

paul mitchell said...

Thanks Lisa Galt, try not to get sick down there in NZ, OSO says they have good FREE! medical services which means they are Cuba-like.

One Salient Oversight said...

Ah Paul.

Decades ago a bunch a racists got together and protested against the civil rights movement, claiming that it would lead to communism and the rise of the antichrist - as per the picture.

Nowadays, lots of people are getting together in Washington to protest against Health Care. In the process of doing so they spit on a black congressman. These protesters claim that increased health care would lead to communism and the rise of the antichrist.

Same group of racist loons, different era.

One Salient Oversight said...

Ah yes...

To this day, the Democrats are credited with passing civil rights legislation when NOTHING could be further from the truth. Why is that? Because they fought so hard in their losing battle they had to change their ideology on that topic and immediately they attribute their original ideology to the opposing side. Why does the national media promote the idea that Democrats and liberals helped pass civil rights legislation? Because those media people are liberals and when liberals finally chunk an idea because they are losing in the ideological battle, they immediately attribute that idea to the opposing side.

Facts:

1. Democrats controlled Senate, Congress and White House in 1964.

2. Congress passed Civil Rights act in house 290-130 and in Senate 73-27.

3. Democrat house vote was 152-96. Democrat senate vote was 46-21.

4. Republican house Vote was 138-34. Republican senate vote was 27-6.

5. Southern Democrats house vote was 7-87 (opposed). Southern Democrats senate vote was 1-20 (opposed)

6. Southern Republicans house vote was 0-10 (opposed). Southern Republicans Senate vote was 0-1 (opposed)

Conclusion 1: Civil Right act of 1964 was approved by Democrat controlled congress and ratified by Democrat President.

Conclusion 2: Southern congressmen from both parties (though dominated by Democrats) opposed the act vigorously.

Four months later is 1964 presidential elections. Barry Goldwater runs a conservative campaign which loses the election but gains the South. Conservatives, especially Southern conservatives, migrate over to the Republican party over time.

In short:

Those who opposed Civil Rights legislation were overwhelmingly southern conservatives, regardless of party affiliation.

Southern Conservatives have remained conservative but direct their votes over time to whichever party practiced and / or preached conservatism.

The Republican Party since Goldwater has become more conservative and has generally won over the conservative vote, including the South.

paul mitchell said...

OSO, again you continue to make my case. Race is the one thing that matters to "progressives." Why do you only write about the civil rights acts?

Anyhoo.

Oddly, of those Democrats that voted against the Civil Rights Acts, all stayed Democrats. TWO Democrats changed their party affiliation. Weird how that works, huh? One that filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the love of Barbara Boxer's life or can you NOT read? The Democrats are still the very same folks that they always were. They simply change they song and dance and repackage it into more stuff that causes an increase in poor people and devastates the black community.

Folks left the Democrat Party BECAUSE they are dumbasses and try to subvert the Constitution, when Dems do that, everyone suffers.

I am sorry that you continue this. You clearly have no clue about which you speak. But, that was clear two years ago.

Just so you know, Al Gore's father was one of the Democrats that lost his seat because he voted against the Civil Rights Acts.

Weird how facts keep slapping you around, huh?

paul mitchell said...

And about the incident in DC. Now, accidentally spitting on someone is racist? Dude, get a friggin' grip, you are losing it.

JMK said...

"No free speech for fascists!"

Isn't that the idiotic rallying cry of today's Left?

The same dolts who decried McCarthyism ("No free speech for Commies") just a few decades ago?

Wasn't the sainted RFK, in FACT, Joe McCarthy's right-hand man, along side Roy Cohen?

I believe he was.

The SAME Conservatives who fought for FREE SPEECH for ALL (including Nazis and Communists) back then, are the same ones who fight for "Free speech for ALL," today.

Look, bottom-line, if you can't make an effective argument against Nationalism Socialism (beautifully summed up by its most famous/infamous acolyte; "We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions..." (A Hitler, May 1, 1927) then you deserve Nazism!

Hey! Aren't the above Hitlerian sentiments the sentiments espoused by the regressives (a/k/a "progressives") of TODAY???

Likewise, if you can't make an effective argument against Free Minds and Free Markets, private property rights and individual LIBERTY, then you deserve all of those!...You DESERVE America's FOUNDING Design!

Conservatives (today's Supply-Siders) made very effective affirmative arguments AGAINST Nazism in that day....today's Leftists can't do the same against Free Market economics, private property rights and INDIVIDUALISM.

Hey OSO, I don't blame the Left for NOT being able to make such arguments against LIBERTY over "freedom"/license....I can't make them either, which is why I'm a Free Market, Paleo(socially Conservative)-Libertarian.

Skunkfeathers said...

Game, set, match, Paul/JMK. O Bunch of Oversights is doing no better here than Erik.

JMK said...

"No free speech for fascists!"

Isn't that the idiotic rallying cry of today's Left?

The same dolts who decried McCarthyism ("No free speech for Commies") just a few decades ago?

Wasn't the sainted RFK, in FACT, Joe McCarthy's right-hand man, along side Roy Cohen?

I believe he was.

The SAME Conservatives who fought for FREE SPEECH for ALL (including Nazis and Communists) back then, are the same ones who fight for "Free speech for ALL," today.

Look, bottom-line, if you can't make an effective argument against Nationalism Socialism (beautifully summed up by its most famous/infamous acolyte; "We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions..." (A Hitler, May 1, 1927) then you deserve Nazism!

Hey! Aren't the above Hitlerian sentiments the sentiments espoused by the regressives (a/k/a "progressives") of TODAY???

Likewise, if you can't make an effective argument against Free Minds and Free Markets, private property rights and individual LIBERTY, then you deserve all of those!...You DESERVE America's FOUNDING Design!

Conservatives (today's Supply-Siders) made very effective affirmative arguments AGAINST Nazism in that day....today's Leftists can't do the same against Free Market economics, private property rights and INDIVIDUALISM.

Hey OSO, I don't blame the Left for NOT being able to make such arguments against LIBERTY over "freedom"/license....I can't make them either, which is why I'm a Free Market, Paleo(socially Conservative)-Libertarian.

paul mitchell said...

OSO, again you continue to make my case. Race is the one thing that matters to "progressives." Why do you only write about the civil rights acts?

Anyhoo.

Oddly, of those Democrats that voted against the Civil Rights Acts, all stayed Democrats. TWO Democrats changed their party affiliation. Weird how that works, huh? One that filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the love of Barbara Boxer's life or can you NOT read? The Democrats are still the very same folks that they always were. They simply change they song and dance and repackage it into more stuff that causes an increase in poor people and devastates the black community.

Folks left the Democrat Party BECAUSE they are dumbasses and try to subvert the Constitution, when Dems do that, everyone suffers.

I am sorry that you continue this. You clearly have no clue about which you speak. But, that was clear two years ago.

Just so you know, Al Gore's father was one of the Democrats that lost his seat because he voted against the Civil Rights Acts.

Weird how facts keep slapping you around, huh?

One Salient Oversight said...

Ah Paul.

Decades ago a bunch a racists got together and protested against the civil rights movement, claiming that it would lead to communism and the rise of the antichrist - as per the picture.

Nowadays, lots of people are getting together in Washington to protest against Health Care. In the process of doing so they spit on a black congressman. These protesters claim that increased health care would lead to communism and the rise of the antichrist.

Same group of racist loons, different era.

One Salient Oversight said...

Ah yes...

To this day, the Democrats are credited with passing civil rights legislation when NOTHING could be further from the truth. Why is that? Because they fought so hard in their losing battle they had to change their ideology on that topic and immediately they attribute their original ideology to the opposing side. Why does the national media promote the idea that Democrats and liberals helped pass civil rights legislation? Because those media people are liberals and when liberals finally chunk an idea because they are losing in the ideological battle, they immediately attribute that idea to the opposing side.

Facts:

1. Democrats controlled Senate, Congress and White House in 1964.

2. Congress passed Civil Rights act in house 290-130 and in Senate 73-27.

3. Democrat house vote was 152-96. Democrat senate vote was 46-21.

4. Republican house Vote was 138-34. Republican senate vote was 27-6.

5. Southern Democrats house vote was 7-87 (opposed). Southern Democrats senate vote was 1-20 (opposed)

6. Southern Republicans house vote was 0-10 (opposed). Southern Republicans Senate vote was 0-1 (opposed)

Conclusion 1: Civil Right act of 1964 was approved by Democrat controlled congress and ratified by Democrat President.

Conclusion 2: Southern congressmen from both parties (though dominated by Democrats) opposed the act vigorously.

Four months later is 1964 presidential elections. Barry Goldwater runs a conservative campaign which loses the election but gains the South. Conservatives, especially Southern conservatives, migrate over to the Republican party over time.

In short:

Those who opposed Civil Rights legislation were overwhelmingly southern conservatives, regardless of party affiliation.

Southern Conservatives have remained conservative but direct their votes over time to whichever party practiced and / or preached conservatism.

The Republican Party since Goldwater has become more conservative and has generally won over the conservative vote, including the South.

Post a Comment