Yesterday, one of those peaceful, non-violent, love-y members of the perpetual stupidity movement got dead. Here it is, GOOD.
Neither did James Lee. He even published that hatred of humans in his list of demands.
I had to run some errands this morning and caught part of the Laura Ingraham radio show. I enjoy listening to her and do so quite often when I am able. This morning she was talking about the eco-terrorist. Laura actually said that this is NOT an indictment of leftist ideology. She could not be more WRONG. (Check out more after the jump.)
That is EXACTLY what it is. Frank J at IMAO put it very well in his humorous way, "No amount of actual left-wing violence will stop the whining about potential right-wing violence."
You see, the "Progressive" or leftist ideology espoused by Democrats is one hundred percent ANTI-HUMAN. Every move that Democrats make is to KILL PEOPLE. Sorry, but the truth sometimes hurts your widdle feelings. When your very ideology and actions attempt to reduce the population of the planet, and then you take that ideology to the Nirvana level, you wind up with ZERO PEOPLE.
To put it more clearly, if your philosophy calls for a smaller human population as a goal, then the ULTIMATE goal is the eradication of ALL HUMAN LIFE. If fewer people is good, then ZERO people would be awesome. That is simple to understand for even the most dense person.
Do you want to know who I credit the unmasking of the Democrat or liberal platform? Feminists. Want to know how?
The "feminist" movement began with the fight to achieve baby slaughter, it was NEVER to get equality for women in the feminist movement. The movement's entire ideology was based around the total sexualization of women and the absolution of any morality at all. It is completely contradictory to what they say they want to accomplish, yet the bottom line is theirs is the ideology of DEATH.
To put it simply, the feminists fight to protect their imagined right to KILL HUMANS. Theirs is the perfect example of what James Lee actually had the intestinal fortitude to publish. All the "Progressives" believe the same things that James Lee posted, except those "Progressives" actually have the creepy insight to NEVER actually speak what they desire. on other words, THEY FREAKING LIE.
Now, James Lee was a Gore-bot. He got his terrorism inspiration from the Goracle's "An Inconvenient Truth." LITERALLY, Al Gore's moonbattery was the inspiration behind Lee's actions. Gore drove James Lee to attempt to kill people. Laura Ingraham does not see it that way, but she is not following through with the thought process or either she has too much DAMNED COUTH to actually say what everyone knows. Why she said what she did is anyone's guess, but she is WRONG.
While reading Wendy Sullivan's post on this, she also uses sarcasm to make her point. Yes, Right Girl, I blame Al Gore for placing the murdering motivation into Lee's already deranged head. Even Lee said that it was because of Al Gore's lunatic movie. Lee told us that is why he was doing it.
Back to the feminists and why ultimately THEY are to blame for James Lee's Al Gore inspired meltdown.
Quite simply, we have become a nation of confused, androgynous doofuses. With the ever-increasing onslaught of the feminist rantings about killing babies, men have to reign in their manhood. We can no longer say manly things, we have to act like we are walking around sporting vaginas. WITH SAND IN THEM.
We have been forced to defend and feign respect for the indefensible action of killing people. If you shall notice, the "Progressives" also defend to the nth degree the murdering political ideology of Islam. They support the Muslim ideology because it mirrors their very own. Death to people.
In a stunning move of evidence of God's intervention in the world, while Crazy Gorebot was threatening to kill as many people as he could, Bolivian rivers are experiencing a devastating winter that is causing the greatest ecological disaster in history.
James Lee attempted to slaughter humans because of a LIE. Of course, "Progressives" and eco-terrorists are not concerned at all with actual science, they are concerned with the falsifying of data to achieve their ultimate goal, removal of man from Earth.
I have no idea when this philosophy actually started, but the eco-terrorist ideology was promoted early in the 1970s by NASA "scientist," Dr. S.I. Rasool, with his publishing of a paper on the rapidly approaching ice age. I cannot find that paper on the webbynets except in pay per view format. One of his partners in crime was none other than NASA's current moonbat, James Hansen, one of the biggest AGW proponents on his hoped to be free of humans planet.
Put this in a scientific perspective please, the Earth is around four billion years in age. The atmosphere has been able to support carbon-based lifeforms for about 3.5 billion of those years. The eco-terrorism movement has gone from screeching about the destruction of the entire planet from MANMADE global cooling to MANMADE global warming in a period of less than forty years. That is around 0.00000001% of the age of the Earth. All of that even when it was only 1955 when we standardized the method of recording temperature.
Does this sound at all like competent SCIENCE? Of course not and it certainly isn't mathematics, either. Especially when the very same alarmists are at the very core of the screeching. No, theirs is a POLITICAL agenda, just like the feminists.
Of course, the abortion of MILLIONS of babies does not support the best interest of any human on Earth either and feminists are the ones that supported that slaughter.
Look at that happening in the same way that we are forced to look at the attempted bombing by James Lee. They refused to accept the moral high ground of elevating man to the top of the species pyramid.
Mine is not simply a religious ideology either. It should be the very same as those that CLAIM to believe the Theory of Evolution. If HIGHER life forms have evolved from lower life forms, shouldn't the "evolutionist" place more importance on the "higher" life forms? Why do they not?
Because of that mentality, born by the feminist movement, that slaughtering human being is OKAY. I propose the premise that if you support a SINGLE tenet of the religion of "Progressivism," then you support them all.
What you simply must do is to perform the necessary tasks of connecting the "Progressive" dots. Every single tenet of their religion is geared toward one single outcome, the death or eradication of humankind and the way that they continue to gain followers is to browbeat normal people into submission with the totally trumped up emotional aspect of their "death to man" philosophy.
Look at what useLESS idiot, Alan Colmes, published just after "Progressive" James Lee got dead, "Anti-Environmentalists Already Using Crisis To Promote Its Agenda."
Since you do not support the attempted slaughter of the people in the Discovery Network building, you are an anti-environmentalist, folks. This is what passes for logic for them.
We had moved from actually allowing children to work to help support the family to the coddling of criminals in less than 100 years because of the ideology of "Progressives." Isn't it about time that we put the fork into their ridiculous moral relativism before they actually ACHIEVE their murdering goal?
We have now in our White House, a sackless, WOMYN president that personifies everything that is wrong with the world today. It is beyond time to end these craziness. Oh, and go burn a bra and kill people. That is what feminists want you to do and we all know what happens when they get upset.
Please take the time to comment.