Sunday, September 19, 2010

In Defense of Christine O’Donnell

Oh yes, a new Republican chick is in the crosshairs of the "Progressives." Is there any doubt why?

It is simply because she is not as ugly as a mud fence.

What in the mortal Hell is wrong with those on the left that makes them hate women that are not ugly as Aunt Esther Obama or the Head Democrat Female, Nancy Pelosi?

IT. IS. ENVY.

There is no way for a leftie to debate anyone on any issue, so they simply have to make as many accusations as possible about the intelligence level, the philosophical beliefs, or the appearance of a normal person. This is because "Progressives" are hideously ugly, sandpoundingly stupid, and morally bankrupt.

Christine O’Donnell, please keep doing what you are doing, because when the left goes batshit crazy, it is a good thing.

"Ewwwww, she's a witch."

Holy crap. See: Sarah Palin.

And I know that you are wondering how I know this so well. It is because I know hot bikini chicks, even Teh Google acknowledges that I am number four in the world in knowing hot bikini chicks. (By the way, Teh Google says that I am NUMBER ONE this morning. Y'all are awesome.)

Please take the time to comment.

Enhanced by Zemanta

9 comments:

Red said...

Totally linked!

Skunkfeathers said...

And it ain't just libtards. The moron head of the state GOP in DE is agin her. Pantywaste Mike Castle -- who she trounced -- is agin her. Hell, even Charles Krauthammer and Karl Rove don't support her. Small wonder the Republican establishment managed to snatch defeat in '06 and '08. Go Christine! Make 'em all look stupid!

paul mitchell said...

Thanks, Red!

But, Skunks, why is it that Democrats hate chicks that are not so unattractive they make you puke?

Anonymous said...

Because, men love them, men hold the door open for them, open pickle jars and slay dragons. Yet they want to be valued for what they've been told in liberal arts/women's studies courses. And what they've been told in those courses is that we all need to be equal, well, Christine isn't equal, she has (much) more than "her share" of the girl next door beauty, as does Sarah, as does Dana Loesch, as does Michele Bachmann (even @ 54 years?). That's not the way it supposed to work.
That their beauty, isn't just skin deep is really quite impossible to understand.
That Christine took x years to pay off student loans is a big deal, yet nobody dares to ask who paid for Obama's years at the most expensive private high school in the USA, never mind Occidental, Columbia and Harvard. And the thing is, Christine paid for it, the left just doesn't do that, and doesn't get why anyone else would either.
and Sarah, had 4 babies, and then had Trig. Don't even get me started on that one.

It_is_envy... perhaps some self loathing too.

*Paul you're up there with Ebam's world, well that's The Show isn't it.
marc in raining cold calgary

paul mitchell said...

Marc, I only wish that I was up there with Ebaum. That would be cool to get BANK for blogging.

I also hope that the vast majority of people notice that the "Progressives" are brutally attacking these chicks. Dang, they go all in on beating up on girls. What kind of bullshit is that?

Skunkfeathers said...

Ah, but according to how the NAGs work, women being attacked in the media is supposed to set them all on the PMS warpath, right? *BUZZZZZZZZZZER* The NAGs are like monkeys trying to f**k a football, when someone says something negative about THEIR heroines or other drugs of choice; but when it's against intelligent, attractive, CONSERVATIVE women, it's okay to diss 'em. The libtardettes can't stand Sarah, Ann, et al on accounta cuz Sarah & Co are all the things that they ain't. And that ain't fair ;)

Anonymous said...

Hi, Sebast Here, I enjoy this joint I could definitely get stuck here.

Anonymous said...

Because, men love them, men hold the door open for them, open pickle jars and slay dragons. Yet they want to be valued for what they've been told in liberal arts/women's studies courses. And what they've been told in those courses is that we all need to be equal, well, Christine isn't equal, she has (much) more than "her share" of the girl next door beauty, as does Sarah, as does Dana Loesch, as does Michele Bachmann (even @ 54 years?). That's not the way it supposed to work.
That their beauty, isn't just skin deep is really quite impossible to understand.
That Christine took x years to pay off student loans is a big deal, yet nobody dares to ask who paid for Obama's years at the most expensive private high school in the USA, never mind Occidental, Columbia and Harvard. And the thing is, Christine paid for it, the left just doesn't do that, and doesn't get why anyone else would either.
and Sarah, had 4 babies, and then had Trig. Don't even get me started on that one.

It_is_envy... perhaps some self loathing too.

*Paul you're up there with Ebam's world, well that's The Show isn't it.
marc in raining cold calgary

Red said...

Totally linked!

Post a Comment