Brawndo - The Thirst Mutilator

Please remember, this blog was built by a dude that is struggling daily to become the man that I am supposed to be. Past posts are quite a bit language-y and for that I am not ashamed. Much. You should be warned that if you delve into the posts from the past, things might get a little...harsh, shall we say?

While I have tried like the dickens to ignore the Global Moslem Uprising we all knew was happening twenty-five years ago, I simply cannot avoid addressing Barry Obama's (and all of his sycophants) apparent childlike suicidal/homicidal outbursts of late. Because make no mistake, either Barry is trying to get normal people killed or he is trying to get killed himself.

Remember when everyone kept saying that Barry Obama was quite possibly the Smartest President in History™? I have cranked up the Big Brain on Me over the last couple of days and tried to figure out why this Sooper-Dooper smart guy thinks like he does.

ON TO THE BLOGSHOW!!!

The news from the past nine hundred-five years (905) has not been positive with regard to the Moslem (Religion of Peace) growth worldwide. The current (and Smartest in History!) President has been quick to point out that Christians (Flying Spaghetti Monster worshipers) have had their own violent past and he (in his infinite wisdom) references "The Crusades." Most younger people, those that have not had a decent education, think that "The Crusades" was a movement from the Vatican to slaughter those BROWN people in the Middle East. What "The Crusades" were about, in truth, was to beat back the slaughtering hordes of Moslems Hell bent on taking over the world, circa 1095.

Why certainly there were YUGE! errors in judgment by "The Crusaders," but such is the very nature of WAR. While I have never had the misfortune of participating in WAR, I am not a moron and can quickly determine that when one is tasked with a Killing Project, mistakes will often be made. Warriors are given a task and part of that is to make sure that they survive to continue toward task completion. An example? Why certainly.

If I were tasked by the TSA to make sure that dangerous people were not allowed to travel in my sector, I would certainly NOT choose to make travel difficult for certain segments of the traveling population, I would focus the majority of my attention on other particular parts of the traveling population. This is really simple. I would look for men, in the prime of their lives, that appear to be of a particular ethnicity. Then I would ask them to draw Mulehammit. This is not RAAAAACISM, per se, it is called "Profiling." Yes, yes, yes, I know that some people of lesser intelligence think that this is bad, but we should not listen to the "wisdom" of people that think fast food workers need to make fifteen dollars an hour. We should not listen to them because they are stupid.

Now, please understand, the words "Moslem" or "Islam" were basically unknown to the entire world until the 1600s because this was not considered a "religion," it was simply a bunch of slaughtering, evil, "Progressive" men, that were not attractive (and smelled like OUTSIDE), trying to take over the world and force females to submit to their deviancy. In the modern understanding, the one that argues that Christians are evil and should be stopped, "Moslems" are considered to be "Peacemakers." These "modern" folks are the very same people that think Barry Obama is smart.

You see, those people are stupid.

In recent history, (let's just call them "Imbeciles" because that is what they are) Imbeciles want to remove decency and goodness from our planet. Why would they want to do that? Because they think that they are birthed to this world for the sole purpose of having a good time with no consequences. "Imma git mine! or "We Own Strike!" Everything that they believe is geared toward taking things that do not belong to them and using those things as their own. By the way, since Barry Obama pointed out that the United States of America is the only place where mass violence occurs, check out this list of mass violence that has only occurred in the United States of America since the 1980s. I am absolutely positive that removing guns from the hands of law-abiding US citizens would have thwarted every, single one!

Ever since this blog was launched, I have spent the majority of my time arguing a certain philosophy, the ONLY philosophy, that leads to personal success and achievement. Yes, Snowflake, it is most definitely about living your life in the manner that leads to WINNING at life. My philosophy leads to intellectual, physical, personal, and spiritual success in your life. The Smartest President in History™ has a philosophy that leads to failure, destruction, chaos, and death.

Why is it so hard to actually take the words and actions of the Imbeciles and show them to other Imbeciles so they can determine their individual wrongness? Well, quite simply because they are Imbeciles. However, it is our duty, to our fellow man (this implies "woman," too), to continually point out to them the quite obvious (to people of normal intelligence) nature of their wrongs. Yes, this is increasingly difficult to do, given the Imbeciles lack of intellectual curiosity, but it is our Great Commission. Sorry, normal folks, I know that it is frustrating beyond all reason that we have to continue to hammer home the point that Moslems want to rape, pillage, plunder, slaughter, and steal, but such is the nature of DOING THE RIGHT THING.

We normal people also have to perpetually engage people that are DOING THE WRONG THING because we have to attempt to make this a better place for humanity. As long as man (this implies "woman," too) has existed on this planet, there have been men (this implies "women," too) that have tried to make this planet worse. It has to do with the nature of man (this implies "woman," too). Yes, we are all fallen and can only turn in one direction to attempt to get back up. As we head into this time of the year, it is our duty to make sure that everyone around us is aware who we are and why we do the things that we do, sometimes with great effort.

Now, because it is so important, my prayers are going out to all of the Imbeciles that have no intellectual firepower to understand the importance of my prayers. By the way, I am praying for all you normal folks that do understand that importance.

Please take the time to comment.

Catholicism, Contraception, and How Freaking Stupid Are Progressives?

Since I have been driving in excess of 250 miles a day, every day, for the past week, I have had a good opportunity to hear the national news on the radio plenty of times. I have heard almost every network play this clip of the moronic Nancy Pelosi and her clown-like statement on the House hearing about Barry Obama trying to throw out the First Amendment and referencing a ridiculously stupid, WRONG statistic on how many Catholic women break doctrine on contraception.

Did you understand that last paragraph?

Ignore that Nancy states that the House was having a hearing on women's health, in fact the hearing was about whether or not the President could simply MAKE A LAW telling Catholics that they had to provide a service or item, that specifically breaks their doctrine, to all of the people that work for their church and the service organizations they run. Firstly, the President CANNOT make any laws, but he can come in and force people to do certain things by Executive Order (FIAT) or by getting one of his goon squad federal agencies to regulate those hideous things into existence. However, I want you to understand that Barry pushing this item on Catholics is exactly like what is going to happen when I am President and force all Muslims to have sex with dogs and pigs. I am going to do it, too! Of course, it won't be really hard to do because most Muslims already screw sheep and camels.

Anyhoo, here's the video. Take it away, Assclown!

VIDEO REMOVED FROM YOU TUBE.
Now, is there anyone on Earth that believes that 98% of Catholic women use birth control? If you do, I feel sorry for you because you are retarded. I wonder where in the mortal Hell that number originated? Oh, here's the pdf of the study from Guttmacher. You would think that it is a monumentally huge tome, huh? No, it is just eight pages and the first two are title and index.

Here's what I found about this study's findings. FROM READING IT.

1. The study did not specifically point out that the best means of contraception according to "Progressives" is homosexual men having anal or oral sex.

So, maybe the idiots in the national media, "Progressives," just took that study that was done for no purpose that I can find, (other than to attack Catholics, just read it.) and turned Gutt's silly numbers to attack the Republican controlled House of Representatives that are making baby steps to protect our BILL OF RIGHTS!!!

2. The only women that were polled were ones that had had sex in the last three months, who were not pregnant, postpartum, or trying to get pregnant. (p8, par 4)

Now, if you are "Progressive," the only reason you would get pregnant would be to have an abortion, remember? But, on the three months thingy, most media types would think that was 100% of all women because media types have sex regularly with multiple unknown partners like 176.67% of all stupid "Progressives." This is untrue in reality with PRACTICING Catholics though.

3. The women polled, who affiliated with Catholicism, did not have to actually PRACTICE the religion.

Of all women that have had sex in the last three months and were studied for this joke, 25% said they were Catholic. Of that number, 20% NEVER went to Mass, 26% attended less than once a month, 20% monthly, and 33% went to Mass once a week. (p4 first bulleted list, last item)

4. One thing that no one even mentions, never married women that actually PRACTICE a religion as a group do not throw that monkey around like "Progressive" women. (p4 second column, third bullet, 48% screw)

Guttmacher actually gives you ALL of the data to intellectually make Nancy's statement into the stupidity that it really is.

So, just to recap, of "Catholic" women in the study, who have had sex in the past three months, only one third went to Mass regularly. So, just to recap that, because I actually HAVE a brain, we ignore all Catholic women, 15-44, that are NOT SCREWING. If a single, Catholic woman actually FOLLOWS doctrine, she is NOT screwing to begin with, so Gutt doesn't count her. Wonder why? Because they cannot use those women to help erode our RIGHTS...

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Please take the time to comment.

Merry Christmas, Y'all

Please take the time to comment.

The Week in Paul Mitchell

I am vacationing with the Ball and Chain's parents for the Christmas holiday. I am checking the blogs and throwing out random comments and trying to catch up on a little work.

The federal government can kiss my ass this week. Seriously, they can't ruin everything in a week, can they?

I am sorry that I cannot see everyone that I want to see while I am in The 'Sip, but y'all will have to forgive me. I'll make it up to y'all later and there shall be a little extra in your check this week.

Plus, we made a video for y'all for this most special holiday and hope you'll take it to heart. We pray that the Religion of Peace feels a twinge in their evil hearts over the celebration of our Savior. Much love From the Family...Merry Christmas, folks.



Please take the time to comment.

Thou Shalt Not Covet

The more that I think about the "philosophy" of the Democrat Party, the more that I come to realize that it is evil to the core. I am not even saying that it is stupid, I am saying that if you vote for Democrats or support their policies, you are going to Hell.

Since I am Catholic, I am honor bound by the Big Ten. You know 'em, no other G_ds, no graven images, no Lord's name in vain, remember Mass day, honor your folks, don't kill, don't screw around, don't steal, don't lie, and don't covet.

Is there one in the Big Ten that are not violated by every single policy of the Democrat Party? Face it, folks, the Democrat Party sat down to determine their party's platform, took the Ten Commandments, then wrote the exact opposite in its stead.

Lemme just make the statement, which cannot be disputed, if you are a Christian, you cannot be a Democrat. Sorry, it flies in the face of everything that is taught in Christianity. You can claim to be a Christian and Democrat, but you have to ignore everything that being a Christian entails.

As an aside, the Jooooooos believe the Ten Commandments, too. Who the Hell knows what Buddhists believe, Hindus do not eat beef, and those wacky Religion of Peacers think that killing is the only way to get to screw undeflowered underage girls. Personally, I think that the RoPers are the epitome of sick tools.

Let's get with it.

No other G_ds. The Democrats have unlimited G_ds in their ideology. They have made every effort to remove the one true G_d from everything they do. They keep talking about separation of church and state like it is actually in the Constitution. In case you were unaware, the idea that they take as GOSPEL, comes from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists.

No graven images. Seriously, every image that the Democrats use in all of their correspondence is a graven image. Let's just point to the Che tee-shirts. Let's point to the No Nukes Peace Sign. Let's point to the Recovery Act signs.

No Lord's name in vain. When you have a Vice President that uses gutter profanity at the lectern on national television, what do you think goes on behind the scenes?

Sunday, Bloody Sunday! President Obama has not gone to church since he was president except for one time to campaign for his stupid ObamaCare crap.

Honor your parents. Democrats do not even believe that a mother and father are necessary for raising children. Meet my two mommies!

Thou shalt not kill. How many abortions has the Democrat Party committed to date? How often do Democrats praise the Religion of Peace?

Don't commit adultery. Do we really want to go there, President Clinton? Eliot Spitzer?

Thou shalt not steal. Um, currently Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters are being charged with that. Also, there are eight more folks in the Congressional Black Caucus being investigated for stealing.

Don't bear false witness. The Democrat Party chunked so much false witness at George W. Bush, those eight years are sending every one of those morons straight to Hell. Still to this day, the Democrat Party continues this false witness.

Finally, no coveting. This one is the entire economic policy of the Democrat Party. Remember when President Dumbass said, "Spread the wealth?" That means taking from those that have stuff and giving it to those that do not. The Democrats continually talk about the "less fortunate" and giving them free stuff from the other folks.

As long as we are on the fact that if you are Democrat, you cannot be a Christian, we might as well really talk a minute on the coveting thing and the "financial equality" promoted by morons.

Here's the note that I penned that spawned this post:

Everyone having ONE MILLION dollars is the very same as everyone having ZERO dollars.

What the Democrats advocate is taking money from the people that have earned it and giving it to the people that did not. The Democrats do this in order to buy votes from stupid people. And of course, it works because those stupid people do not understand that behavior is COVETING and it does nothing to improve the lives of anyone.

What this action does is perpetuate the problems for everyone. When you take money from the person that earned it, you rob that man of the fruits of his labor and he is less motivated to produce. The person that receives money for work that he did not perform experiences a diminished self-worth no matter how much he says that he needs that wealth.

It also keeps the man that earned money from expanding his business to actually include more people in the workforce. This is very simple to understand and you have a perfect situation now that illustrates this circumstance in spades. With the uncertainty of the huge tax increases coming in December, no one is hiring and more and more people are joining the rolls of the unemployed.

All that said, if you do not want to go to Hell, then never ever vote for another Democrat as long as you live.

Please take the time to comment.

Drive-by Blogging - A Hodgepodge

Hodgepodge: [hoj-poj] –noun a heterogeneous mixture; jumble.

Heterogeneous: [het-er-uh-jee-nee-uhs] –adjective different in kind; unlike; incongruous.

Well, it is official, the Barrystream Media is out in full force touting the unemployment numbers this morning. The non-farm payrolls added 431k jobs in May. This sounds like good news, huh? Well, when you back out the temporary census jobs, the other temporary jobs, and the birth-death adjustment, the economy added a whopping NEGATIVE 226k jobs. This is extraordinarily BAD for the United States and subsequently, the world.

Not only that, but still yet again, Rule 48 is invoked on the NYSE. Face it, there is no possible way that Barry Obama could be a worse failure than he has already been as a president, a leader, and a human. It is NOT POSSIBLE.

What purpose does the national media serve again? The State, maybe? Welcome to the Soviet Union folks, we elected our masters.

And if you do not see enough of the corruption that is the Democrat Party, then here is still more of the never-ending sleazepile. There is no way to stop Democrats once they are elected, we have to NOT ELECT them to begin with. DO NOT DO IT.

Yesterday I had a long and enlightening conversation on Teh FAILbook with a friend from college who currently lives in Atlanta. The damned boy never let on in school that he was not a moonbat. The fun part of that is the reasoning behind his doing that. He did not want to suffer the repercussions from the professors of actually stating his opinions or exposing his ideology. He was jackbooted into keeping his mouth shut, which is exactly what liberals do to people that do not toe the moron line.

In another discussion, another friend toes the moron line perfectly with the opinion that black folks have always been victimized by the white man. Let's ignore the fact that the most recent victimization by racists has been the exact opposite. Check on the happenings in Africa this very minute. The seizure of white owned farms, by the black rulers, resulting in the starvation of ALL people is occurring TODAY. It is NOT happening one hundred fifty years ago, it is happening RIGHT NOW.

How does this bullshit happen exactly? Well, let's check on what Chris Christie has to say on the issue.


It is blatantly obvious to anyone that even tries to understand what is happening that TEACHERS have given up on actually trying to impart knowledge and the desire to learn. BECAUSE OF THEIR LIBERALISM.

In case you did not know it, liberals DEPEND on misinformed and uninformed people to spread their terrible message. The message is that YOU are not smart enough to provide for yourself and you have to have someone to LORD over you.

Sorry, I do not buy into that ideology and never will. This is the hill upon which I choose to die. I shall never give up and I shall never give in to any other man. I refuse to be a slave, I choose DEATH instead. To you liberals, come take my life, because I shall never surrender it to you, you must TAKE IT without my permission. You have to steal MY possessions or murder me to get what belongs to me.

Back in June of 2009, I penned an article that articulates my ideology and the success that it facilitates. In the same post, I showed how our liberal ENEMIES try to gain followers, by purchasing more human beings with their idiotic policies. In the United States of America, we now have a class of people that we regard as poor that live a life of luxury not known in any other country on the planet. These people have sold their souls and their freedom to the highest bidder and THEY VOTE for their masters.

Not only do they hand the whip to their masters, they also actively seek lesser and lesser accommodations for everyone, too. They lobby for a lifestyle not known since the Middle Ages. And some are allegedly intelligent.


But, at the very same time, they want their masters to have everything that their little black hearts desire.

And at the very same time that they are bleeding the world dry of all intelligent people that produce to earn their living, they vilify those very people that make their lives better.

Why do liberals do this? BECAUSE THEY ARE STUPID. They are dumbasses of the highest order. If they cannot be persuaded to see the truth, then they must be FORCED to see the truth while standing on the sidelines panhandling for their alms.

Those that would have you slave in their salt mines to produce for the lazy have always told you that was the Biblical way to live your life. However, there are many, many more Biblical references to WORK. One particular one comes to mind for me and seems like they made a movie about it. Lemme see if I can remember it and it even talks about your slavery, too! Win-Win!

13 For six days you shall labour and do all your work.

14 But the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any work—you, or your son or your daughter, or your male or female slave, or your ox or your donkey, or any of your livestock, or the resident alien in your towns, so that your male and female slave may rest as well as you.

15 Remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the Lord your God brought you out from there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm; therefore the Lord your God commanded you to keep the sabbath day.

So, remember, you WERE a slave, now you are NOT. Get to work, dammit.

Please take the time to comment or click one of the 'Share/Save' buttons.

By the way, here is a Motorola Droid for twenty bucks, dude.

My Thoughts on the Media Attacks on the Catholic Church

I have some numbers in my head that I can drag out on a whim and something tells me that this big dust-up in the media is simply more of the same to insult religion and Catholicism in particular.

First the ridiculous disclaimer so idiots do not attempt to tell me that I am supporting child molestation. UNDERSTAND, child molestation is WRONG. An adult even TALKING to a person under the age of majority about sex is wrong, IF THAT IS NOT THEIR CHILD. That is why I state plainly and for the record teaching children "safe sex" in schools is WRONG. Again, an adult, other than a child's parents, talking to a child about sex is WRONG.

We went through another bout of the national media beating up on the Catholic Church about molestation a few years ago. I crunched the numbers and they were shocking. READ THAT LINK!

Now, from my old post, I TRUST ME....YOU SHOULD TOO. (from 2005)

There are currently 46,254 ordained priests that are active in the US today. That translates to a percentage of 0.000047563 of priests have been charged with molestation or other sexual crimes. The funny thing about this is that rate is 1/750th of the rate of molestation in non-priests. To go even further, the homosexual male is 17 TIMES more likely to molest a child than a heterosexual male. Go figger.

And the evidence that I found stated that some of these allegations against priests do not even involve PHYSICAL CONTACT. What does that even mean and how is it molestation?

Now, not to point out the overwhelming, neon obvious, but if reducing child molestation was your goal, don't you think that maybe there would be more focus AWAY from the Catholic Church since the rate is so much LOWER with priests?

Now, to chastise people that are jumping on priests and making it a G-d thing. Priests, clergy, nuns, pastors, meditation gurus, and witch doctors are all HUMANS, they are nothing but HUMANS. Personally, I do not expect my religious advisor to be MORE righteous than I am because I am striving to be more Christ-like. Any guesses as to why people that are spiritual advisers are less likely to commit crimes? Any clue why people that follow their religion are less likely to commit crimes? (This excludes Muslims.)

Here's a hint: It ain't because they practice moral relativism.

Now, if the media is GENUINELY concerned about child molestation, they should stake out some public schools, because that is where MOST of it happens.

Please take the time to comment or click one of the 'Share/Save' buttons. DO IT NOW!

Here's an important site update. We just hit a FIVE on the PageRank thingy on The Google. We had been stuck at FOUR since 2007. We are now ten percent more important in the webworld.

Because Batshit Crazy Comes in all Different Sizes

It never ceases to amaze me some of the things that folks believe with absolutely no skepticism at all. They need no facts, no proofs, not one shred of evidence and still they believe certain stuff. Even as a very small child, I needed proof of damn near everything. I am a natural skeptic and a natural cynic. I want to delve deeper into anything that interests me. I guess that I am just curious by nature, but plenty of folks are not. There are an awful lot of folks that go through life without taking one second to move beyond the very limited knowledge of what they are taught from others. And that is their right, too!

BUT! When those folks that are, by nature or nurture, intellectually incurious, and their intellectually incurious attitude starts to invade my personal space, I push back. And how. I do not live in a country that forces me to believe what everyone else believes and for that I am very grateful. Guaranteed in our very constitution is an individual right to practice religion as I see fit.

For the past five years, I have been publishing this blog. These are my thoughts, and they belong to me. I certainly hope that I can win minds over to my way of thinking, otherwise I would not publish. The way that I win those folks over is that I produce facts and evidence to back my ideology. Again, I am naturally skeptical and inquisitive, so if something peaks my interest, I dive right in and learn as much as I can about that topic. This makes me a huge target and I accept that willingly.

Anyhoo, there are certain topics that have been pretty settled for me for quite some time. Years even. That is okay, too. If new evidence arises that disputes my ideology, I willingly look at it, parse the information, and modify my understanding if necessary. Such is the nature of knowledge in a world that has only just now reached the damn computer age.

Yet, there are a few things upon which I am immovable and I readily admit that. Mathematics are king in my world. If something contradicts basic mathematics, you know, it kinda has to be false in Paul-land. ONE AND ONE IS TWO. THE ANSWER IS TWO BECAUSE THAT IS THE NAME THAT WE GAVE THE SUM OF ONE AND ONE. I guess I made a decision long ago to base my knowledge upon those things, but I really have no concrete memory of ever having consciously done so.

But, well, well, well, we have found some leftist science that attempts to contradict this mathematical standard that I have set for my knowledge. A very good, specific example would be the leftist belief in The Theory of Natural Selection. The minimum standard of basic mathematics tells us if all life "evolved" from one single celled organism, then the basic concept contained by The Theory of Natural Selection would have produced BY FAR more failures than successes. Random mutation simply must provide those failures at a much greater rate than it would the successes. Therefore, most of the fossil history would show much greater evidence of failure than success. It would also produce huge numbers of transitional animals and plants, but never have we found one in the search of over 150 years. In other words, based only on the known mathematics standards, The Theory of Natural Selection is patently untrue. If Darwinists find an animal or plant that does not fit their timeline, they simply modify their timeline to shoehorn that animal or plant into their theory and continue.

Not only that, Darwinists (those that have FAITH in Natural Selection) have stated that everything proves Charles Darwin's theory. If EVERYTHING proves the theory, then exactly how do you perform experiments? By definition, The Theory of Natural Selection becomes what is known as a "pseudo-science" meaning that it is utterly disprovable. The very theory contradicts what science IS by definition.

science - a method of learning about the physical universe by applying the principles of the scientific method, which includes making empirical observations, proposing hypotheses to explain those observations, and testing those hypotheses in valid and reliable ways; also refers to the organized body of knowledge that results from scientific study

So in other words, The Theory of Natural Selection meets none of the criteria to even be acknowledged as science, but still those Darwin Cultists persist. Personally, I think that they only want to disprove G_d, but I have no clue what goes on in the mind of crazy people.

Also, since the freedom to practice any religion at all was solidified in The Constitution, Darwinists and their religion do not affect me. It is irrelevant in Paul-land and has been since I was a very young person, because I could perform basic mathematics.

But, the ideology or religion of Anthropomorphic Global Warming affects me greatly. Since the cult of AGW has been repeatedly refuted by actual scientific evidence, the AGWers have gotten more and more persistent. There is even a disciple occupying the White House right now! Please ignore the fact that the latest prophets are the very same folks that promoted the ideology of the coming NEW! and Improved! Little Ice Age a mere thirty-five years ago (dump those aerosol cans!!! *pdf here* please notice that even then they were trying to reduce population growth), WE SWEAR WE ARE GOING TO BURN THE FUCK UP!!!

Since the temperature climb that the AGWer disciples were referencing ended in the late 1990s, they have slowly started calling their religion, "Catastrophic Climate Change." The fun part about this whole scenario is that there have been ZERO scientific standards set (that have been followed) to determine even the basic raw data necessary to perform the experiments to record FREAKING temperature.

Also COMPRE-FREAKING-HEND that the damn scale for determining temperature was only conceived in 1724. That would be two hundred eighty five years ago for you leftists that cannot perform basic mathematics. The Celsius scale was not conceived until 1742. Remember, the Celsius scale was modified in 1954, too. Just so you know, that is when the Kelvin Scale was given its modern definition. By the way, rarely is the Fahrenheit scale used for scientific experiments in case you were wondering. Why? I could not care less, why.

So, in the "science" world, the actual temperature scale was not even truly solidified until FIFTY-FIVE years ago. On a planet around three point five billion years old! But, fuck me to death, folks. Man has fucked up the world and we are all going to die, we better pass some laws outlawing the emissions of CO^2!!!

Since leftist "science" just NOW has a very basic platform for you to understand, maybe the normal folks, NOT BATSHIT CRAZY, might want to speak up about having all of our civil liberties removed from our lives because of something that is a mere twenty-three percent of the age of our very country.

You see how crazy and crazy and crazy it is to be a liberal? At some point, I shall figure out how it is that the ideological left can even continue to exist.

And one question for the believers in the religion of Darwinism, if there is a survival of the fittest concept built directly into your religion, why are y'all the ones that get all pissy when I put dolphin in my canned tuna? It seems that the continued extinction of species would help you in your worship ceremonies. Y'all should make a bunch of signs that say, "Fuck the polar bears!" and team up with your compatriots, the AGWers, to create a super religion or something.

Please take the time to comment.

Talking Back to Morons - Part Infinity

I dipped into Twittah for a minute tonight and saw this question from a drooling wetbrain. The person that asked this question claims the moniker "Christian Prochoicer" on Twittah and this is their bio: Pro-choice, pro-family, pro-sex education. Christian!! Deuteronomy 31:6 & John 15:18. This person that obviously has no clue of the underlying meanings of anything, went back and forth with me after I answered their question. My responses are MoM for Mean Ol Meany, theirs are DWB for Drooling Wet Brain. Follow along and then I shall comment.

 

DWB: Hey #tcot I'm still waiting for where the Bible says "give to poor- unless it's thru gov't intervention." #p2 #px #Christian #Catholic

 

MoM: @KushielsMoon Just curious, is the government "the poor" or do you just not want to understand what The Bible means? #tcot

 

DWB: @meanolmeany The poor is thousands of Americans to start, and then millions more across the world. #tcot

 

MoM: @KushielsMoon What does that have to do with government? That was your question, was it not? #tcot

 

DWB: @meanolmeany My question is why are some Christians against giving to the poor just b/c it's done through the government? #tcot

 

MoM: @KushielsMoon And my question is "Is the government the poor?" That seems like a simple question to me. #tcot

 

DWB: @meanolmeany No. Americans, thousands of them, are the poor. I answered that already.

 

MoM: @KushielsMoon To answer your question, The Bible says to help the poor, the goverment is NOT the poor. Understand? #tcot

 

DWB: @meanolmeany You're not understanding me. I am not saying we should "help the gov't." I'm saying help poor ppl with gov'ts assistance. #tcot

 

MoM: @KushielsMoon The Bible says to help the poor. The government is NOT the poor. You must be liberal. You are very dense. #tcot

 

DWB: @meanolmeany .... I've already said multiple times that I am NOT talking about the gov't when I say "the poor." #tcot

 

MoM: @KushielsMoon No, you are saying give money to the gov't based on Biblical teaching of helping the poor. What are you missing here? #tcot

 

DWB: @meanolmeany You obviously have no idea what I'm saying. Hopefully someone else can answer my original question. #tcot

 

MoM: @KushielsMoon I understand EXACTLY what you are saying, and yours is a disingenuous question and I pointed out why. #tcot

Number one, Goodness! How dense can one person be? This is the kind of idiocy that is more than prevalent in society today. The Bible says "Give to the poor, why can't it be through the government?" 

Here is your answer, in plain terms that even someone as disingenuous as a liberal can understand. The government is NOT THE POOR, so why give money to the government because The Bible says to help the poor? The Bible tells us many times to take care of those that are lesser than ourselves, the government is NOT THAT. The Bible does not tell us to give money to another rich person so THEY can take care of the lesser of us. The Bible tells US TO DO IT. Those that are not even marginally astute make the case that government can fulfill Biblical teachings, yet The Bible tells US to worry about our very own salvation, not to pay someone else to take care of it for us. Do not try to claim that you are following Christian principles and advocate the government taking care of YOUR PERSONAL DUTIES according to Biblical teachings. That is a cop-out. Or according to The BIBLE, SLOTH, one of the Seven Deadlies. 

Please take the time to comment.

Oh God! How I Love Morons SO!!!!

No lie, idiots make me laugh like a ten year old looking at nekkid boobies. This is from a FAILbook group that one of my friends has joined.

Please understand that I am in the architecture field. Leftist idiots are the standard. Yes, I have plenty of friends with whom I must avoid any type of substantive conversation. As long as we are talking about what kind of music we like or what beer to drink, all is well. When we talk of philosophy or politics, I must shun them, it is too much like talking to a fucking stump.

Anyhoo, this group was formed to fight churches that disagree with gay marriage. Y'all probably know that I think that government should NOT be in the marriage business at all. They only have those filing statuses for tax collection purposes. And there is a TAX PENALTY for marriage, by the way. The deduction is LOWER for married couples, but Hells to the NAW! They are too stupid to know that.

I am just curious to know what THIS CHURCH is going do when they lose their tax exempt status though. And where exactly do Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton preach again?

When are the SMART lefties going to run these morons off?

Please take the time to comment.

Six Months Four Days - And Hell Followed With Him

No, I am no Biblical scholar, I am Catholic, remember? But, taken from the King James version of the Bible, Revelation 6:8 seems to pretty much cover all of President Incompetent's plan for our country.

And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

Now, if I think that Barry is a delivered from G_d to bring about the vengeance from above, then I have to believe that so were his "intellectual" brethren like Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and AIDS.

Then, I have to accept that this future predicted by Revelation is going to take a damn long time and it is going TO HURT.

Please take the time to comment.

(For some reason, Bible verses look better in italics to me. SKRANGE.)

On the Alleged "Separation" Clause

With the murder of Dr. Tiller earlier today, the morbidly ill lefties that are joyous over his death have renewed their HATRED of Christians and religion in general. Please ignore the fact that Dr. Tiller was MURDERED in CHURCH, so the abortionist was even trying to save his soul from Hell.

I cannot COUNT the number of times that I have seen "separation," "church," and "state" typed today. Once and for all, HERE is the ONLY Place that had been UTTERED until around 1940 or so, when our descent into Communism started.

Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists

To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.

Gentlemen

The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.

Th Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802.

This was written to a group of men in Connecticut to REMOVE the federal government from a STATE debate concerning some legal issues. The letter was written for a specific purpose and if you read it, yo can PLAINLY see that President Jefferson was saying that the federal government had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO SAY about any state religion.

From this one little letter, we now have TOTAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL of our lives. When the leftists lie about something, WE HAVE TO CALL THEM ON IT.

No matter how frustrating it is.

Please take the time to comment.

Fairness, or Everyone EQUALLY Poor? (Two Dogs reads the Bible)

I happen to think that the image in which G_d made man was one of rational thought to shape his surroundings and to increase the quality of life for all men through the benefit of one man's work, not for the benefit of mortal man, but for the benefit of man's eternal salvation. I was taught that G_d created the heavens and the earth from rational thought and His own labor. Also, Adam and Eve were "supposed" to live eternally in the Garden, free from all want. I think that G_d knew that having that perfection, he had removed from man's mind, that "own image." Perfection guaranteed is not perfection. It must be earned to place that value at a higher price. Was the "fall from grace" planned? If we accept the premise that G_d is perfect, we must assume that it was.

(This acceptance was of ultimate importance for me. There also exist many, many interpretations of Biblical teaching, but my basic, original concept FORCES me to remove from my consideration, other men's thoughts. My salvation depends solely on me. No other man can provide MY salvation.)

This concept started me on my quest for knowledge. Armed with very basic premises in the preconceptions that I had of G_d, religion, and man, I had to deduce and abstract certain basic facts upon which to build. AND, if I accept that original fact that man began the Garden, then I had to build on that fact and resolve issues and conflicts in teaching before I could move forward in my intellectual study of G_d and the basic foundation of my beliefs. To ease my investigation somewhat, the Bible is written in a chronological progression. Allegedly.

I had to first learn to add, then subtract, then multiply and divide. I had to first learn letters, then words, the sentences. The progression of the learning process is simple when broken into parts. This is also why the "whole learning" method of teaching is ultimately unsuccessful. Writing the letters in Helen Keller's hand was the only way for her to ever learn to communicate. From there, the world of a blind, deaf-mute was revealed. We are ALL Helen Keller at the beginning and we are all given at birth what we need.

To do the same as G_d on a much smaller scale is how I attempt daily to make myself more like G_d. That is the DUTY that I am given by G_d and to create or to shape the world around me is paramount to me achieving the greatness of which I am capable.

Others disagree with my philosophy and accept the paralyzing premise of original sin that states that man shall always be a sinner and can never be perfect.

However, the Bible also teaches us that Jesus died for our sins. I don't question that fact. And I go one step further to the abstraction that if Jesus gave his mortal life for penance for my sins, do the sins still exist from my birth? We cannot say that abortion is the taking of innocent life AND say that all men are sinners, they do not equate. Also, the Bible never tells me that I cannot achieve perfection here on Earth. It simply tells me that at the time that Jesus was crucified, He was the only man without sin THEN.

Now, to understand what this means to me, a quick definition of sin is needed. It is specifically "transgression of divine law." Since I think that "in His own image" refers to the ability to rationally contemplate things and ACT on those deductions, doesn't it seem to support the THEORY that man CAN achieve perfection while still mortal man? I don't think that I need to spoon feed the transgressions that are considered sin, we can do that at some other time.

I am in no way attempting to ease my tasks on earth, this actually makes my job that much harder, I desire perfection. I think that in order for my eternal salvation to be awarded, I must PRODUCE with nothing in my philosophy to undermine those efforts, to achieve the greatness of the man that died on the cross. Yes, Jesus WAS a man in that form, the abstraction of Jesus as the Son of G_d did NOT die on that cross. That said, I cannot abide the contradictions of philosophical ideology at all. Facts must beget facts, whether in math, science, ideology, or religion. <--"I'm not religious at all, but I'm very SPIRITUAL, LOL!" Shut up. That is quite possibly the dumbest thing that I have ever heard, and there are a bunch of dumb things that I have heard in my lifetime. To divide spirituality from any basic concepts or premises of anything allows you to bounce from one theory to another. Hence, NOT very G_d-like. Contradictions abound in that environment. Global warming, global cooling, catastrophic climate change....see?

Now, just as the verses yesterday told me to take care of the plank in my own eye FIRST, which tells me that only when my individual house is in order, only then can I help with the rest of the world. If original sin and always a sinner is actually the case, then NEVER can I do anything to help another. These DO NOT equate either. It is one or the other, both cannot be true at the same time. Of course, logic tells you that if you allow yourself to do so, backsliding is possible. It is not a matter of always rolling that rock uphill, it is a matter of addition, then subtraction, then multiplication and division. Git it?

G_d cannot be illogical. G_d is reality. G_d has no contradictions.

Now, with my conception that G_d DEMANDS that I practice rigid individualism to continually insure my salvation, we launch into the daily diatribe.

At the very core of my being, I know that the anti-intellectualism of the the far left that is about to take even more control of our country, IS EVIL. The philosophical concept of the far left is that of original sin, not specifically mind you, because they do not think. I can never achieve greatness because the Bible tells me that I can never remove the original sin from my life. Only in numbers and tossed into a group of like-minded people, can I find my safety. Never in the "own image" shall I ever live. This reduces me ultimately to the lowest of the low because I look for my worth in other men. But, again, in this mode I believe that no man can be perfect, so therefore I do not have to be perfect, and the cycle continues to spiral downward toward Sodom and Gomorrah. This is a simple step by step reduction of all things that are to be G_d-like. Contradictions in my philosophy cannot exist. A snake cannot be a sheep.

Example: "A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy." Ingrid Newkirk, President PETA. Therein lies the philosophy of the left. Where are the scientific, mathematical, philosophical, and religious limits in that statement? That is EXACTLY where leftist philosophy leads. Everything leads to the bottom. It is the Biblical concept of Satan personified. The statement from Newkirk is the epitome of evilness.

Now for the reality of where our country stands TODAY. We have effectively removed the slightest chance for individual achievement, the possibility to be more G_d-like. We have taken the very basic premises for the greatest creation than man has ever made, the philosophy that gave us the United States of America, and turned them inward to guarantee Sodom and Gomorrah. We have removed any chance for greatness by instead focusing on the militarily FORCED equality of all men. A decidedly anti-intellectual (G_d-like) philosophy that accepts the root premise that man cannot ever strive for perfection because he is forever sinful.

In no short order is the total effect of that philosophy as apparent as in today's Zimbabwe. A few years ago, Zimbabwe represented the richest, most successful country on the entire continent of Africa. Then, the philosophy of original sin, and of FORCED equality was instituted with the ideology of giving every man the exact same thing as every other man. In extremely short order, anti-intellectual concepts were realized and the ultimate ends of that lack of philosophy achieved its ONLY ends. Every single person living in poverty with absolutely no remote chance of escape from crippling poverty, rampant disease, and a cruel, violent, torturous life of the shortest duration of any country on the continent.

People that do not accept the simplistic truth that contradictions cannot exist in reality, exclaim "But that can never happen in the United States!" and they fail to acknowledge that we have the proof in pockets all around this country. Detroit, Cleveland, the Mississippi Delta, commoners in DC and Chicago, all PROVE the point. Contradictions CANNOT exist in reality.

Until recently, the Republican Party represented the ideology of freedom FROM government and the removal of the shackles of bondage chained to the mass of meat that is the unthinking left. However, those Republicans did not see the very reason that they were swept into office in 1994 and tried to become like the congealed mass of ignorance that IS government. Still, the party is closer to the ultimate goal, but daily the party moves more in the direction of Zimbabwe. The Democrat Party has been in that area since the early 1800s and has never moved from that anti-philosophy ever, ever inching closer to the ultimate goal of man's destruction.

A country with no rudder at all cannot head in the right direction. <--"I'm not religious at all, but I'm very SPIRITUAL, LOL!" And a country cannot have at its helm a person that refuses to even attempt to recognize that a rudder is needed. It is not a political party that shall move us in the right direction, but men. Men determined to do the things that are right to accomplish what they desire in an effort to achieve their individual salvation for their individual sake are the only way that we shall ever right the course of iniquity and moral relativism.

All those words to say, "There is a right and there is a wrong."

Now, is there a solution? Of course, there is ALWAYS a solution. Take the plank from your own eye and then you can see clearly to remove the sawdust from your brother's eye. To me, this doesn't mean that we need to get a bunch of screeching fools to rush the stage and throw Barry and his evil ilk from the planet. It means that we must engage all of those that do not understand the philosophy of the individual and greatness. Take them aside, one person to another and let them know that the only method of achieving the individual greatness for themselves is to THINK for themselves.

"Jimmy Pete, you once bought me a beer and in return for that favor, I shall offer you the world, IF you are smart enough to take it."

The only reason that the un-philosophy of Barry Obama was able to win is because there exist many more people that have no ideology or philosophy. They heard the anti-intellectualism of the un-man and saw the safety in never having any constraints of reality or the need to assume responsibility. Barry removed from those people the need for a mind.

Our task is to give them back their minds.

Please take the time to comment.

Holy Crap, I Forgot!

I am so sorry y'all, in the rush to finish up two projects before the end of the year so I can bill the clients and write the debt off as losses, all the while still receiving the cash for them next year, I forgot that it was almost Chrimmus.

<--This is me at home right now, preparing to play you a zippy Christmas song with perfect pitch and intonation. Filled with joy and caring.

In less than 1.5 hours, it shall be Christmas here in G_d's Country so I want to extend a sincere and warm Christmas gift to all of you who read this ridiculous bullshit that I post daily. I certainly appreciate you wasting your time daily to read what spews forth fully unformed from my melon. Calling out my favorite reader in front of all of you others would make everyone feel somewhat uncomfortable, so I shall just say this. You know who you are and I certainly appreciate your comments on a frequent/semi-daily/daily basis. You comments are so insightful/witty/serious/well thought out and I certainly like your posting name/real name/anonymous comments. I love you and think of you all the time. You know who you are. If you are asking, "Is he talking about me? I'm his favorite commenter?" Yes, I am and yes, you are.

You always hear people say, "Remember the reason for the season!" As a gift to you this year, I offer you the permission to punch whomever says that, right smack in the throat. And you should offer this retort as well, "I am almost certain that Jesus, the supposed reason for the season, would certainly prefer that you live your entire year with the same phony enthusiasm that you dredge from the wretched bowels of your miserable existence during late December, you phony douchebag."

However, you must supply the smile when you say it, then they shall never know whether or not you're kidding. And we all know that you are not.

Now, the single best thing to come from Chicago in the last fifteen years, I present....a Christmas song for your musical enjoyment.



And hopefully you have a joyous and Merry Christmas filled with family and friends, good food, and that your every wish for the day comes true. You are all in my prayers daily. Thanks for making this such fun for me.

Please take the time to comment.

Big Government Dies and Goes to Heaven

I have heard many people argue the point that the Bible tells us to help those less fortunate than ourselves. This is the tact that they use to confiscate more of our wages for social programs. Let's try that argument on G_d.

Dead big government moron: I was the promoter of forcing everyone to give half of their income to the poor.

The Creator: So you mounted a door to door campaign to preach the Gospel and convince those people that I was the only true way to salvation and My Word told them to help the less fortunate?

Dead big government moron: No, I enacted legislation that made those people give until they had to sacrifice their children's food and move to smaller houses just to afford to live.

The Creator: You have caused those very same people to hate the poor. Every single one of my children suffered because of your actions and you forced hate upon My Creation. You are evil and shall be cast into the forever burning fires of Hell. Enjoy.

Discuss.

A Bizzarre Look at Religion

Whew, boy! This shall be fun. I am Catholic. Well, I am a bad Catholic. I rarely go to mass, but I try to live my life according to my faith. I depart from some of the tenets of my religion and make decisions based on my intellect most of the time, but I try to adhere to the things that I have been taught from my church. I sometimes fail, but the desire remains to follow the teachings. I'm trying to be the shepherd.

I believe in G_d, the maker of Heaven and Earth. I believe that He is all-knowing, all-seeing, and knows exactly how things are going to work out. However, I believe that G_d gave to man, the freewill to make his own choices. And I believe that at some point, man will be forced to live for infinity with the repercussions of those choices. Yes, in Dog's Land, Heaven is real and if you make the cut, you will be there forever. And "forever" really doesn't mean anything, in that sense.

I learned that G_d created man in his own image. No other living thing was created in G_d's image. That makes man the single most important creation of G_d's hands or whatever digits He possesses. (I occasionally like to think that G_d has like octopus sucker arms with fingers. He would be an awesome centerfielder and could do macrame' at the same time.) In my opinion, that belief makes man the master of the Earth and it irks me no end that the Left believes that man is the reason for all bad things on this planet. They are partly right, but mostly wrong. (Next to last paragraph, why they are right.)

The Left believes that man is pure evil, I disagree. I believe that man, if left to his own devices, produces everything that is vital to make this planet more enjoyable to man. The Left believes that man, if left to his own devices, will destroy this planet and all its living creatures.

I believe that man is the master of all other living creatures. The Left believes that all animals, including man, evolved from a primordial soup and that the value of a sheep-dog-pig-boy are all equal.

With all that being said, why would anyone ever be surprised at the capacity of depravity from the Left? Why do we look at their actions and continue to be horrified when they make suggestions that we find deplorable? Why is it that we sit there and are dumbfounded at their suggestion for the legality of partial-birth abortion? They have told us for over forty years what they believe, why do we not believe them when they say the things that they do?

Because we are stupid and will not make the efforts to understand that they are being honest with their agenda. We believe simply that there are no humans that could embody the evil that is required to propose the ideas that they hold dear. It is our own fault that there is even the possibility that their legislation is passed. We are the cause, we have accepted their moral codes and their values of life in general. It is our fault.

I have made a commitment to myself that anytime in the future that the Left proposes legislation that is contrary to my beliefs, that I will point that out to my reader and to my Congressman or Senator. I know that sounds "preachy," but it is my obligation to myself and my beliefs that I voice my opposition to things that are in direct conflict with the values that I hold dear. I vow to no longer be silent even in situations that may appear to make me look like an asshole. I will ask the questions of people that need to be asked and never allow them to shirk their responsibilities for their decisions. I shall be the thorn that no one wants because I believe that I will have to answer for my actions.

And I will sleep like a baby, sucking my thumb and probably wetting the bed.

(Hat-Tip: Herb, for pointing out why I need to do this.)

Please take the time to comment.

I am Two Dogs and I am a Catholic.

Yea, it sounds like the intro to my spiel in a twelve step meeting, but it seems lately that there are all kinds of folks opening their pie-holes about our newest pope. I guess that I am no different now.

Point One (I): He is a Catholic. That's a good thing because it seems that there some people that wanted the new pope to have issues with Catholic doctrine. Hey, too bad. Go find another religion to turn into a feel-good cesspool of ambiguous thoughts and ever-changing beliefs on what is right, just, and good. Morons.

Point Two (II): Whoops, he's white. It seems that there were a bunch of folks that wanted the Catholic church to turn into some kind of diversity clinic. Hey, let's make that Black guy pope 'cause he's Black. Hey, too bad. The Catholic church has been doing this pope thing for a long time now, I am pretty sure that they have figured out what works as a rule, and they probably ain't gonna change now. Those Cardinals, they have no idea how to pick a pope. Morons.

Point Three (III): He's old. Yea, I know that we will probably have to pick another pope in the future, but how is that any different than what we have been doing for a few years now? Hey, I got it! Why not just pick a baby pope? Then we can train him to be against everything that the Catholic church stands for. Morons.

Point Four (IV): He is stoic and inflexible. I know, I know, he's old, white, and Catholic. He has a constitution that doesn't allow him to let his beliefs to "evolve". That damn pope-guy. He should realize that our environmental fights, homosexual marriage, priest marriage, women priests, and birth control are good things. Why won't he lighten up? Morons.

Point Five (V): He is not going to "grow" the church membership because of his "positions". You know, I kinda agree with this 'diss', wait, no I don't. The people that are spewing this load of crap ain't going to church anyway. The Catholic church has been around for alot longer than NOW, Greenpeace, the Log Cabin Republicans, 'Kill All the Fetuses', and the 'Sphere. I'm guessing that it might be around alot longer still than these other groups. Morons.

Conclusion: You can try to change things with rational discourse and logical argument, IF there are problems. You cannot change things by attacking an entity that has been around forever and has been continually successful in its endeavors to help people by maintaining a solid, rigid, and constant path with some type of drivel about society changing. Our society IS changing and my argument is that it is not for the better. People that have sacrificed their morals on the altar of diversity are undermining the stability of our planet. Just remember what Ayn wrote, "If you encounter contradictions in your analysis, then your premises were wrong, moron." Yea, they edited 'moron' out. It seems that it might have made someone cry.

UPDATE I: Sadie at Fistfull of Fortnights has THIS to report: Susan Estrich petitions the Vatican to do away with that ruffian Benedict XVI and appoint a female pope instead.

UPDATE II: Corie at Insane Troll Logic has THIS and THIS to add. Them damn Catholics....

UPDATE III: More Q&A is HERE, thanks to The Anchoress.

UPDATE IV: For some reason, I found THIS humorous. (Hat-Tip: TOM)

UPDATE V: The final update. PAM led me to THIS and I still can't quit laughing. In case you were wondering, HERE is Oolong. And while you are there, check out ENGRISH.

.

More Great Things About Catholicism

Okay, after perusing a few of the articles that Google has cached, I have to eat crow. There are more than three priests that have been charged with sexual molestation. The three that I was referring to were all in Boston. Here's the numbers, remember, here at this blog, we only deal in facts, not innuendo and rumor. On to my lashing.....

There have been twenty-two priests charged with the crimes of molestation, fondling, and child abuse in the last three years. Ninety-six percent of the Catholic Dioceses have no record of any of these crimes committed. The overwhelming majority are from the Northeast and we know that they are not part of Jesusland, but rather part of the United States of Canada.

More numbers to support some of the things that I spewed: The vast majority of these crimes took place in the late sixties and early seventies. Not to say there have not been some of these crimes committed before or after, but most occurred then.

Even more numbers: Since the Catholic church started collecting statistical data on these crimes, there have been 148 defrocked priests and the church has spent over 800 million dollars settling these cases. Most people just got paid. Damn. And 137 of these priests were ordained in the sixties. I'm not too stupid about my church.

Still more numbers: There are currently 46,254 ordained priests that are active in the US today. That translates to a percentage of 0.000047563 of priests have been charged with molestation or other sexual crimes. The funny thing about this is that rate is 1/750th of the rate of molestation in non-priests. To go even further, the homosexual male is 17 TIMES more likely to molest a child than a heterosexual male. Go figger.

Anyhoo, we have to protect our chillun from the bad dudes and dudettes even if they are priests. So, I am advocating that every convicted child molester gets put into general population in his state prison of choice. Hey, them bad dudes (that aren't raping children) ain't all bad 'cause they hate them some child molesters. And they have a tendency to work those problems out.

Also, the network that registers sexual offenders here in Mississippi has lost 1756 registered sex offenders, so if you see some creepy unwashed cat rolling around your neighborhood, call the cops.

Hey, preacher, leave them kids alone.

UPDATE: I read the front page at the very least of every one of the links that we were sent. I am even more confused about these numbers now. Here's some numbers even further back. Around 4400 priests have been accused since 1950, with 75% of those incidences occuring between 1960 and 1984. 68% were made against priests ordained between 1950 and 1979. Although most of these incidents occurred BEFORE 1985, they went mostly unreported until AFTER 1993. Man, the plot thickens. Even more weird is the descriptions of some of these alleged situations. Less than half (the numbers are either 25%, 27% or a total 52%, I can't figure that out) are described as not being oral sex or penile penetration. Even more revealing is that only 3% of priests that were charged were convicted and only 2% served time. So, I still don't know exactly how many priests are doing time for sex crimes, but with these numbers, it seems to be an even smaller sampling that I originally thought.

Of all the weird things in the John Jay study, the most bizarre was this statement:
Most of the allegations involved touching over or under clothing. The study said sexual abuse "includes contacts or interactions between a child and an adult when the child is being used as an object of sexual gratification for the adult." It added that the abuse does not have to involve force or genital or physical contact. This leads me to believe that some of the alleged victims might have just imagined being mentally molested. Forgive me, I am not making light of this, but that just doesn't make any sense. How can any sexual abuse take place when there is no touching? Answers; Bueller, Bueller, Frye, Frye?

.