Thursday, August 21, 2008

Obama Fellating Time Cover Bukkake!!

Honestly, I have no idea how often Time Magazine is even published, do you? There is a big fat hairy deal going on about Time putting Obama on the cover for the seventh time this year. I am sure that is a lot of times, but I could be wrong. If they publish daily, that isn't too much, if they publish once a month, it is.

Anyhoo, who gives one steamy shit?

You can search the Time covers HERE. Or you can see all of the Time covers of Barry Obama HERE.

Here's a cover that you might have missed.

This is the second straight year that Teddy had to share the honors with another moron. Dang, he's becoming just a mediocre-type moron, but that Democrat Party is offering such stiff competition these days. Teddy needs to pick up his moron game a little if he wants to get back to the top.


Please take the time to comment.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Above my pay grade"

The guy is officially a moron...geez, now I see why people were saying he is not ready, I thought it was just sour grapes from Hillary's ppl. Off the cuff is not his strong suit, he can't take a stand to save his life, or offend a constituency. Hillary should have won the nomination, talk about buyers remorse. This guy is a definite loser, he is going to get shredded in the debates.

Another topic why don't you comment on the issue in Georgia? Not the one that has Atlanta, the one in Europe. We look like such wimps. Yeah we can beat up on small countries like Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Venezuala...but not the big boys uh. The last strong countries we fought were Germany and Japan. But that was 67 years ago. We got too soft beating up on small targets. Russia please get out of Georgia, is that all we can muster...now the world knows the US will never fight a strong enemy who either has a large ground force and/or nuclear capability unless we are directly attacked. If China invades Taiwan, we will just sit on the sideline and ask them to stop. All those weapons and we are afraid to use them on a real legitimate adversary. I am not advocating war, but I do enjoy when a bully gets his comupunce(not spelled correctly but you understand). Right now we look like the bully with the big muscles who is afraid to fight another guy who also has big muscles. I don't like war, but I don't like bullies/hypocrits either and right now we look like one. Yeah lets invade little Iraq, little Haiti, little Panama,little Grenada, little Somalia, and little Serbia but Russia or China..uuuhhhh lets work through the UN to find resolution. What a joke, we sent the Marines, Rangers, Green Berets, and Delta Force at the drop of a hat to Afganistan and Iraq...but do the same to Russia. Uhmmmm, lets work with our European partners to find a resolution. Expanding NATO to countries dumb enough to attack Russia must be the definition of insanity yet this President wants to do just that and nobody in our government can or wants to stop him. This guy is about to bring on WWIII by bring in immature democracies inside the NATO umbrella "where an attack on one is an attack on all," and he can't be stopped.(Two dogs do you want your son, and my nephew, to get ground up (in a location less than 10% of the American people can find on a map) trying to defend Georgian territorial integrity??? Which could happen if Georgia gets into NATO and decides to attack Russian "peace keepers" again...insanity)

Roderick

Two Dogs said...

Roderick, you actually posted seomthing that is surprisingly a strong suit of mine. It's really late right now, but I will address the overwhelming "pussification" of this country with regards to our military. I will do that tomorrow.

But, chew on this for the time being. Afghanistan defeated the Russians with our shoulder-fired missiles. We gave them a tool that nearly every single one of our ground forces regularly uses and the Afghanis beat back the entire Russian Army with just that crap. Even the "indestructible" T-72s.

Anonymous said...

This is a joke! It's shameful the way these supposedly professional journalists are fawning all over Obama. Not WRIGHT for America has a hilarious post on this, suggesting Time change its name to Obama Magazine. They even have a mock up of what it would look like. http://www.notwrightforamerica.com

Anonymous said...

Two Dogs,

If Russia used tactical nuclear weapons (for some reason I find tactical and nuclear weapons in the same sentence laughable...like trying to kill a fly by dropping a daisy cutter) Afganistan resistance would have lost. Russia lost because they weren't "strong" enough. If you want to see an interesting contrast look how the Soviets (now Russians) and China handled "democratic" rabble rousers...China shot to kill in Tianamin Square but the Soviets did not have the same "strength" in '91 when their empire collapsed. This is the same thing we did to the South, when they thought they could go off on their own...no South, you belong to the US (countries are like gangs, once your in there is no way out...unless that country is not "strong" enough to keep it together).

The same goes for Vietnam and the US. If we fought Vietnam like we did against Italy, Germany, and Japan (psst..by bombing civilians, since civilians provide the support structure of the opposition) where we had no qualms about bombing "civilian" targets....look at what happened to Dresden and Tokyo (besides what the nukes did).

Simply put when you use nuclear weapons you will always "win."
I am not advocating, but I will say this, with nuclear weapons being available I find the whole notion of "war" anachronistic. We could have defeated Saddam Hussein and Al Queda in one hour...are we "strong" enough? What happens when La Raza wants to break off Arizona, New Mexico, parts of Texas, or California?? Will we be strong enough then, I don't think so. I haven't seen a specific government (not a new gov't,like the Khmer Rouge, but an existing gov't) yet go from weak to strong, it is usually the opposite (Soviet Union under Stalin, China under Mao...both countries are definitely "weaker" now then before, and so are we unfortunately...trials for terrorist, what a joke when you find a terrorist you tie him/her (have to pc) to a tree or fence and SHOOT him/her immediately, this should be the same punishment for urban gang members who are also terrorists)

Roderick
ps-man I am hoping for a military quo in this country. We are too soft and weak, we need the military to take over and shoot all the criminals, just bomb the prisons and get all known gang members and execute them. With the military in charge we don't have to worry about nine black robed diaper wearers saying how it is too "harsh" to execute child rapists. Before you say I could get killed, well I'll take my chances atleast I'll feel safe..don't quote B Franklin about liberty and rights, I don't care I only respect strength.

Myster Baad said...

Why stop with criminals and gang members? Target the least little gesture toward kinder, gentler, anything. The real enemy is our better natures.

Take Franklin off the money and put R. Lee Fuckin Ermy on there, cause America has got to be like boot camp, every day, everywhere. Until this country gets off its 235 year dick suck about democracy, we are crap.

Post a Comment