I have spent the last few days ranting and raving over the sad state of affairs in the Black Civil Rights (read Liberal) movements of today. I would be remiss if I didn't mention the illustrious Ted Rall. Yea, yea, I know, he's white, but he has been an incredibly outspoken racist on the left for quite some time and the gist of my argument all month long has been that liberalism is bad for minorities.
Now for my disclaimer: I am not now, nor have I ever been, Black or African American. I do not profess to speak for anyone that is, BUT I know that for a white man to call a Black woman as "Aunt Jemima" is probably a racist comment. No, Ted Rall did not call Dr. Rice that, but his cartoons have been just as biting. See HERE, HERE, a Black man can't rise above his station in life HERE, jumps on Christians HERE, and ridicules Pat Tillman HERE. HERE'S one just for soundboyz, he jumps on Armstrong Williams. However, my favorite has to be his comparison of our President to Hitler.
Anyway, this display has been brought to you to focus on exactly how generous and kind the left wing of our Republic has become. Never have I seen a display of such dire hatred toward so many people. Ted Rall does not discriminate when he searches for an object of his hatred. Blacks, Hispanics, Christians, and our military; our Heroes are all held in utter contempt.
An Ultra Left Wing Fanatic hating on everyone? Is that so surprising? Not to me.
.
30 comments:
Two Dogs... what you see as "hate", is "truth" for others. You admit that you can't see things from an African-American prospective, so how can you judge? There are non-minorities out there that understand the hardships of racism... and you must admit, this administration sure has a history of being on the side of racist policies.
THANK YOU IMARA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I could NOT have said it better myself! I think Two Dogs is just being an ALARMIST to try and generate more traffic to this blog!One thing I can't stand is a white person ,or another person of a diffrent race other than black, telling black people what's best for them. Like black people can't think or make up their own mind! That in itself is racist!Blacks can, and do, grasp the topics and the issues and are more than capable of coming to their own conclusions.Blacks don't need whites or other sellout blacks to persuade them as to which side of a issue to support!! You don't see someone coming out and telling whites what to think....(except FOX)!Give black people more credit than that. Blacks are just as, if not MORE ,aware of the issues and how they affect them.We don't need a spokesperson for the entire race!Blacks don't like Armstrong Williams because of his views, not because he's black!The same goes for Condelizza Rice or anyone else who happens to be black.We don't hate them because they have achieved, we hate them because they are not representing what is in the best interest of their own.These are classic examples of SELLOUT! In Armstrong's case, he literally sold out. This has been a tactic of whites that date back to the early beginnings of slavery. They would choose a house NIGGA, to convince the field slaves that it was in their best interest to serve MASTER! Whites have always understood that in order to keep racism and segregation functioning, they needed examples of blacks that have achieved in society by expressing the views of whites. If you WERE black,You , Mr.Two Dogs, would be a SELLOUT!
Two Dogs, I think Soundboyz has tapped into a great point! The folks on the "Right", (who said they were the "right" anyway...)always want to dictate to us what we should and shouldn't think/do/buy/say/wear/etc. Makes one think that they don't have a clue, and they want to control those that should(and once were)be in power. It's like the Bully that can't do his own homework so he picks on the smart kid and punks him for his! Just isn't right, no matter how you look at it. Soundboyz brought it up and I'm offering the question... are you an ALARMIST, Two Dogs?
I agree soundboyz, Blacks, white, Asians, Hispanics are all great. I have been associated with minorities my entire life and I can honestly say that up until this month, I have never had such a great debate with someone that obviously has a very different opinion than I do. I thoroughly appreciate the wonderful debate and I promise to open this same type thread next February as long as it is Black History Month.
Just remember, we can't talk about this but one time a year. Do away with the one month thing and I will talk about this matter all year long.
soundboyz, don't you dare stop coming to the site because I am going to stir another bucket of shit on another topic.
And Imara, don't let soundboyz convince you that I am a racist, cause I am not. If you will read the other threads that I have written regarding the topic at hand, I think that you will understand what I have tried to accomplish this month. And thank you very much for stopping by, please do come back.
Two Dogs, I am not accusing you of being racist, the question that Imara and I posed was, Are you an Alarmist?Answer the question.
An alarmist? Good question.
Oh, and I eat meat at every meal, something that will be eventually outlawed if the liberals ever regain power. Alarmist? Maybe. But that is for sure the direction that we are going unless something is done to curb the Reverend Al taking up the struggle for Chicken Sufferage, etal.
Hey, I got that in again. Yay, me!
Two Dogs, I've been checking out your posts, and I must admit... they're pretty interesting! Please continue to throw out great topics, an I promise to keep coming back.
I have to take issue with not being able to discuss racism beyond February. It happens everyday, and if we don't talk about it, it will be ignored and grow and people will continue to suffer. The Civil Rights Leaders, from back in the day, didn't only protest and have sit-ins during certain months. They pressed the issue EVERYDAY! That's the only way change is going to come about.
Soundboyz, you seem like an intelligent "brother", who refuses to let Two Dogs off easy. Right On!
Two Dogs... "Maybe"? Hey Soundboyz, we actually might have a chance to persuade him...
Reverend Al has taken up the struggle for Chicken Sufferage?! I certainly hope it turns out better than the Tawana Browley incident!
Hey Imara, I am flattered by your compliment. I try to look at everything with a open mind .Don't let Two Dogs fool you , he's just being an Alarmist, but I think his intentions are noble.There is hope for him yet!
You want Reverend Al's chicken struggle to turn out "better" than the Brawley incident? I guess that means him actually getting charged with a crime.
Can you really blame the Rev. for coming to the aid of a young girl who claimed she was raped? Granted, some might say she was a lying little #!@*, but do you really think that if the Police were Black, Rev. Al would have still become the focus of the story?
Soundboyz, your very welcome. It's nice to know there are still some of us out there that are still passionate about the "cause".
Sure, Imara, don't group me in with anyone passionate about the cause. I only spent an entire month talking my head off about it. Oh, and Al still claims that she got raped and has never apologized to the cops.
Just curious Two Dogs, as much as I enjoy reading your site everyday, can you talk about anything besides race and politics? Are those your only interests? How about religion? You haven't really discussed that one...
I just did the race thing for Black History Month. Race wars are over, but I have to crack open the religion thing. I am Catholic so this should be fun.
Oh, and I like beer, girls, and rock and roll. Walks on the beach, hand-holding, writing poetry. Those three things ain't me. (NO HOMO)
LOL!! Yes, Two Dogs, you seem passionate about the cause, only I'm confident Soundboyz is passionate about THE cause... you... I'm not so sure.
Why should Rev. "Bird Man" Al apologize for something that he believes is true. Should Bush apologize for believing there were WMD?
I have to leave for work... but I will be back for the religion debate!
Okay, well I am also a Catholic. A converted Catholic, not a cradle Catholic. I have been to just about every church there is (Christian churches that is), so what's up for debate?
Sorry, don't know what happened, it posted my comment three times.
Two Dogs, you ARE passionate about the CAUSE.......you like to CAUSE controversy!Can't wait for the Religious segment of the show.
Oh Commanche...That's normal operation for a Republican Blog. They work like the elections, you post/vote once, and it registers three or more times!Keep on Two Dogs Imara, I think we could have him seeing the light in no time.
Oh Hell yea, we could even talk about election counting. Don't go there soundboyz, there is just too much ammunition. Let's try to get on a good old topic like religion. That is safe compared to our debates on race. And just who in the world would convert to Catholicism? This ought to be good.
No, Two Dogs, let's go there! Too much ammunition... are you actually going to argue the Progressive's point?! LOL
I agree with you Soundboyz. If he can convert to Catholicism, he can convert to anything!
Well I guess I just think that everyone should have something to believe in. After being a member of Baptist churches and Nazarene churches and visiting many other denominations, I found my spiritual home at the Catholic church. Of course there are many things Catholics believe that I personally do not. For example, I do not believe that birth control is wrong and I am pro-choice. Using abortion as a method of birth control, yeah I think there's something wrong with that. But I also believe there's something wrong with women who continuously use our welfare system by having children they can't take care of. My priest would probably not like to hear me talk like this, but it's just the way I see it. Or I could just be honest and say I converted to Catholicism for an excuse to drink! Kidding on that one.
Oh, I did not convert, that was commanche. I was born Catholic, fell from grace and returned. And anyone that actually has proof of any election irregularities other than Democrats registering criminals and dead people, please come forward. Because so far, there has only been innuendo from the Left, there is actually documented proof of election fraud, but it is NOT on the Republicna side, sorry, that is FACT. There is most definitely a post in this, if you want it.
O.K!!!!!! I want it!!!!!!!I cannot believe you are going to sit there and type that CRAP!!!Democrats involved in voter fraud?Wow! Two Dogs. That is crazy, even coming from you. You mean to tell me that you did not hear of the Republicans making up these phony non voter lists and falsely listing people as criminals so that Democrats, minorities in particular, could not vote?You ,Sir, are so Outrageous, it's funny!
Nope, I heard a bunch of stuff from Democratic Underground about things like that but they believe in the Magic Pumpkin. soundboyz, the only fraud that was charged (Charged filed) was against a minority registering group in Ohio. And it was found by Democrat election officials. Bunch of innuendo, no charges=BULLSHIT.
Come to think of it Two Dogs, you're so right on this one. The problem here is miscommunication. See, we've been using two different languages. When Democrats are involved ,it's commonly called "fraud".However, when Republicans are implicated, it's more commonly known as "voter irregularities".I'm sorry, we were speaking two different languages.
soundboyz, there was bullshit from the Democratic Underground about voting bullshit, there were no irregularities charged, it was bullshit. There was actually voter fraud on the Democrat side. I'll check it tomorrow and give PROOF. Sorry, I know it would be great if there was one (1) case of any voter getting turned away from the polls, but there wasn't. Sorry.
Nope, I heard a bunch of stuff from Democratic Underground about things like that but they believe in the Magic Pumpkin. soundboyz, the only fraud that was charged (Charged filed) was against a minority registering group in Ohio. And it was found by Democrat election officials. Bunch of innuendo, no charges=BULLSHIT.
Come to think of it Two Dogs, you're so right on this one. The problem here is miscommunication. See, we've been using two different languages. When Democrats are involved ,it's commonly called "fraud".However, when Republicans are implicated, it's more commonly known as "voter irregularities".I'm sorry, we were speaking two different languages.
Post a Comment